ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Swarm learning network for privacy-preserving and collaborative deep learning assisted diagnosis of fracture: a multi-center diagnostic study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Precision Orthobiologics in Musculoskeletal Conditions.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Review
- Privacy-Preserving Surgical Video Analysis with Swarm Learning - Results from a Multinational Appendectomy Cohort.NEJM AI · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in orthopedic trauma surgery: a scoping review of current applications and research gaps.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence algorithms in orthopaedics: A narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized medical diagnostics, conventional centralized AI models for medical image analysis raise critical concerns regarding data privacy and security. Swarm learning (SL), a decentralized machine learning framework, addresses these limitations by enabling collaborative model training through secure parameter aggregation while preserving data locality. However, no prior studies have specifically developed distributed learning models for fracture recognition due to challenges in multi-institutional data harmonization. We aimed to develop and validate a blockchain-based SL framework for privacy-preserving, multi-institutional fracture image analysis and compare its performance against centralized AI models and clinicians in real-world applications. Methods: We selected knee joint diseases in traumatic orthopedics as representatives to explore the AI imaging evaluation of fractures. The knee joint images were retrospectively obtained from patients diagnosed with knee injuries between December 2013 and July 2023 at 4 independent institutes hospitals in China. A total of 4,581 patients was included for retrospective study and establishment of the explainable and distributed SL model. An explainable object detection algorithm was proposed for the identification of fractures. Based on the architecture, a privacy-preserving SL system was established, and we further validated the performance of the model in external verification sets and clinical use. Finally, the SL system was appraised through a prospective cohort to aid 6 clinicians in the preoperative assessment of 112 patients with knee joint injuries. Results: The YOLOv8n-cls algorithm demonstrated superior performance in centralized experiments and was adapted for SL implementation. Our SL model achieved robust performance in both balanced (AUROC 0.991 ± 0.003, accuracy 0.960 ± 0.013) and unbalanced (AUROC 0.990 ± 0.005, accuracy 0.944 ± 0.021) datasets. External validation yielded an AUROC of 0.953 ± 0.016, matching centralized model performance while maintaining data privacy. Clinically, the SL system achieved 86.8% diagnostic accuracy and assisted treatment decisions in 91.5% of cases, outperforming junior clinicians and rivaling senior specialists in diagnostic efficiency. Conclusion: This study establishes blockchain-based SL as a secure, privacy-preserving paradigm for distributed AI training in medical imaging, with particular relevance for emergency orthopedic diagnostics. Our framework enables effective multi-center collaboration without compromising data security, addressing a critical need in modern healthcare AI. Clinical trial registration: [https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=193847], identifier [ChiCTR2300070658].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.