Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678145›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Machine learning-based prognostic prediction model of pneumonia-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Jing Lv, Juan Chen, Meijun Liu, Xue Dai, Wang Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing LvDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Batch of Key Disciplines on Public Health in Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Juan ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Batch of Key Disciplines on Public Health in Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Meijun LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Batch of Key Disciplines on Public Health in Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xue DaiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Batch of Key Disciplines on Public Health in Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wang DengDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Batch of Key Disciplines on Public Health in Chongqing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to construct a machine learning predictive model for prognostic analysis of patients with p- ARDS. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 230 patients with p- ARDS admitted to the RICU of the second affiliated hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2020 to November 2024 were included. Patients were divided into survival group and death group according to the 28-day prognosis results. All patients' clinical data were first results within 24 h of admission. 20% of the total samples were randomly selected as the test set, and the remaining samples were used as the training set for crossvalidation, and six different models were constructed, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, NaiveBayes, SVM, XGBoost and Adaboost. The AUC value, AP value, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Brier score, and F 1 score were used to evaluate the performance of the models and pick the optimal model. Finally, the SHAP feature importance map was drawn to explain the optimal model. Results: 10 key variables, namely LAR, Lac, pH, age, PO2/FiO2, ALB, BMI, TP, PT, DBIL were screened using the filtration method. The importance ranking of the variables showed that age was the most important variable. Among the six algorithms, the performance of the SVM algorithm is significantly better than that of other algorithms. The AUC, AP, Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Brier Score, and F1 Scores in the test set were 0.77, 0.67, 0.74, 0.60, 0.81, 0.19, and 0.60, respectively. This indicates the potential value of machine learning models in predicting the prognosis of patients with p- ARDS. Conclusion: This study developed and visualized a machine learning model constructed based on 10 common clinical features for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with p- ARDS. The model shows good predictive performance and achieves explanatory analysis in combination with SHAP and LIME methods, providing a reliable mortality risk assessment tool for p- ARDS.

Indexed as

ARDSmachine learningpneumoniaprediction modelrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40678145
PMCPMC12268496

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.