Evidence mapPaperPMID 40678316Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Assessment of neonatologists' competency in managing gestational diabetes complications: a cross-sectional analysis from China.

Yi Yang, Yao Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yi YangDepartment of Neonatal, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous, Enshi, Hubei, China.
Yao YangDepartment of Neonatal, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous, Enshi, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) significantly impacts long-term child health outcomes. This study assessed neonatologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding GDM-related complications in offspring. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 1,614 neonatologists in Hubei Province, China, utilized a validated 28-item questionnaire examining knowledge (12 items), attitudes (8 items), and practices (8 items). Responses were scored on a trichotomous scale. Binary logistic regression analyzed predictors of satisfactory performance across domains. Results: Among 1,614 neonatologists, 1,437 (89%) demonstrated satisfactory knowledge, 1,513 (94%) positive attitudes, and 1,165 (72%) good practices. Knowledgeable practitioners were significantly older (45.4 vs 36.2 years; OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.40-1.44]; Conclusions: Despite high knowledge levels and positive attitudes, particularly among experienced practitioners in academic settings, implementation gaps exist in follow-up protocols and specialist referrals. Practice setting significantly influences care delivery, suggesting the need for standardized protocols across healthcare tiers.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDiabetes, GestationalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNeonatologistsAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancySurveys and Questionnairesalongside significantlyChina cardiomyopathygestational diabetes mellitusKAPneonatologyprevalence

Identifiers

PMID40678316
PMCPMC12268886

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.