ArticleJHLT open2025
Clinical relevance and outcome of routine endomyocardial biopsy to detect rejection after heart transplantation.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Blood pressure control after solid organ transplantation: opportunities for optimizing care.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- A stage-based framework to interpret regulatory T cell biology after heart transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Association between tacrolimus blood levels and biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection in adult heart transplant recipients.JHLT open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endomyocardial biopsy has been the cornerstone of monitoring rejection after heart transplantation for decades. Although recommendations advise routine biopsies during the first 3-12 months, this timeframe is broad, and intercenter variability persists in its application. Here, we report the yield and complication rate of routine endomyocardial biopsies during the past 36 years of post-transplantation care to monitor acute cellular rejection. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we collected all routine biopsy data after transplantation between 1986 and 2022. The total number of biopsies, type of rejection, complications, and survival were analyzed in the total population as well as per different endomyocardial biopsy protocol over time period (Period 1: 1986-1994; Period 2: 1994-2009; Period 3: 2009-2022). Results: In 474 patients (71.1% male, age at transplant 47.7 ± 12.6 years), 8185 routine biopsy procedures were performed: 29.9 ± 11.1 per patient for Period 1 ( Conclusion: Acute cellular rejection, including clinically-relevant rejection, has declined significantly over time and is rare beyond 6 months post-transplantation. A low-frequency approach seems feasible and safe, which is relevant for the transition towards less-invasive protocols to detect rejection, especially early post-transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.