Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678362›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2025

Clinical relevance and outcome of routine endomyocardial biopsy to detect rejection after heart transplantation.

Leendert C Kieviet, Steven A Muller, Mariusz K Szymanski, Manon G van der Meer, M Louis Handoko, Saskia Z H Rittersma, Saskia C A de Jager, Egidius E van Aarnhem, Annelotte Vos, Pim van der Harst and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Blood pressure control after solid organ transplantation: opportunities for optimizing care.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leendert C KievietDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Steven A MullerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mariusz K SzymanskiDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Manon G van der MeerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M Louis HandokoDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Saskia Z H RittersmaDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Saskia C A de JagerTransplantation Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Egidius E van AarnhemTransplantation Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annelotte VosDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pim van der HarstDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Linda W van LaakeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marish I F J OerlemansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endomyocardial biopsy has been the cornerstone of monitoring rejection after heart transplantation for decades. Although recommendations advise routine biopsies during the first 3-12 months, this timeframe is broad, and intercenter variability persists in its application. Here, we report the yield and complication rate of routine endomyocardial biopsies during the past 36 years of post-transplantation care to monitor acute cellular rejection. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we collected all routine biopsy data after transplantation between 1986 and 2022. The total number of biopsies, type of rejection, complications, and survival were analyzed in the total population as well as per different endomyocardial biopsy protocol over time period (Period 1: 1986-1994; Period 2: 1994-2009; Period 3: 2009-2022). Results: In 474 patients (71.1% male, age at transplant 47.7 ± 12.6 years), 8185 routine biopsy procedures were performed: 29.9 ± 11.1 per patient for Period 1 ( Conclusion: Acute cellular rejection, including clinically-relevant rejection, has declined significantly over time and is rare beyond 6 months post-transplantation. A low-frequency approach seems feasible and safe, which is relevant for the transition towards less-invasive protocols to detect rejection, especially early post-transplantation.

Indexed as

Acute cellular rejectionBiomarkersComplicationsEndomyocardial biopsyHeart transplantation

Identifiers

PMID40678362
PMCPMC12269405

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.