ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Negative correlation between relative fat mass and bone mineral density: NHANES 2011-2018.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Utilizing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), this study investigated the association between Relative Fat Mass (RFM) and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in adults, specifically evaluating the impact of RFM on lumbar BMD and determining the consistency of this relationship across diverse populations. Methods: Cross-sectional data from 9,238 adults aged ≥20 years in the 2011-2018 NHANES cycles were analyzed. Relative fat mass (RFM) values were derived through a formula incorporating waist circumference (WC) and height. The relationship between RFM and lumbar BMD was assessed through weighted multiple linear regression models, subgroup analyses, and smooth curve fitting. Results: After adjusting for multiple covariates, RFM exhibited a statistically significant inverse relationship with lumbar spine BMD. In the fully adjusted model, a per-unit increment in RFM was linked to a decline of 0.0110 g/cm Conclusion: The analysis reveals a notable inverse relationship between RFM values and BMD measurements in the lumbar spine, suggesting that elevated RFM levels might correlate with reduced BMD and heightened susceptibility to osteoporosis (OP) development. These observations highlight the critical role of evaluating adipose distribution patterns when devising preventive measures against OP and support employing RFM as an potential indicator for initiating early clinical interventions aimed at mitigating bone density deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.