Evidence mapPaperPMID 40679088Full record

ArticleDeveloping world bioethics2026

Mpox and the Ethics of Outbreak Management: Lessons for Future Public Health Crises.

Adetayo E Obasa, Marietjie Botes, Anita Kleinsmidt, Ciara Staunton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developing world bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adetayo E ObasaRegistrar Research Support Office, Research and Internationalisation Development and Support, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0934-9586
Marietjie BotesStellenbosch University Centre for Research on Evaluation Science and Technology, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6613-6977
Anita KleinsmidtUniversity of the Western Cape, Faculty of Law, Bellville, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0125-7804
Ciara StauntonEurac Research Institute for Biomedicine, Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-440X

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mpox, first identified in captive monkeys in 1958 and recognized in humans by 1970 in the Democratic Republic of Congo, was historically confined to sporadic zoonotic outbreaks in Central and West Africa. These outbreaks, often driven by rodent-to-human transmission in resource-limited settings, reflect persistent systemic health disparities. In recent years, mpox has also been reported in high-income countries (including the United States, United Kingdom and Europe), underscoring its global health implications beyond traditionally endemic regions. This article examines the mpox outbreak through the lens of public health ethics, evaluating how core ethical frameworks-justice (encompassing equitable vaccine distribution and addressing health inequities), solidarity and respect for rights (including intellectual property considerations)-shape outbreak management strategies. These strategies are ensuring equitable access to vaccines and therapeutics amid intellectual property barriers, combating stigma and misinformation through transparent risk communication and fostering international solidarity in coordinating responses. The analysis highlights how neglect of these principles exacerbates existing disparities and undermines the effectiveness of interventions. Integrating ethical principles into outbreak responses is critical for building public trust, accountability and community resilience. By distilling lessons from the mpox response, this article contributes to ongoing debates in public health ethics and outbreak preparedness, arguing that ethically grounded approaches are essential for fair and effective management of future public health crises.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksMpox, MonkeypoxPublic HealthZoonosesAnimalsDemocratic Republic of the CongoGlobal HealthHaplorhiniHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansSocial JusticeepidemicethicsMpoxpandemicTRIPS

Identifiers

PMID40679088
PMCPMC12980560

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.