ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2025
Protein dimerization in 2D vs 3D: Geometric allostery enhances binding affinity.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mechanisms of enhanced or impaired DNA target selectivity driven by protein dimerization.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- A membrane-driven biochemical oscillator tunable by the volume to surface area ratio.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Lipid-driven alignment and binding of p7 dimers in early oligomer assembly.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of enhanced or impaired DNA target selectivity driven by protein dimerization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dimerization underpins all macromolecular assembly processes, both on and off the membrane. While the strength of dimerization, KD, is commonly quantified in solution (3D), many proteins, such as the soluble BAR (Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs) proteins, also reversibly dimerize while bound to a membrane surface (2D). The ratio of dissociation constants, h=KD2DKD3D, defines a lengthscale that is essential for determining whether dimerization is more favorable in solution or on the membrane surface, particularly for these proteins that reversibly transition between 3D and 2D. While purely entropic rigid-body estimates of h (hRIGID apply well to transmembrane adhesion proteins, we show here using MD simulations that even moderate flexibility in BAR domains dramatically alters the free energy landscape, driving enhanced stability of the native dimer in 2D. By simulating BAR homodimerization in three environments, (1) solution (3D), (2) bound to a lipid bilayer (2D), and (3) fully solvated but restrained to a pseudo membrane (2D), we show that both 2D environments induce backbone configurations that produce more enthalpically favorable dimer states. Comparing with theory, we show that this surface-induced or geometric allostery violates the rigid-body estimates to drive h ≪ hRIGID. Remarkably, contact with an explicit lipid bilayer is not necessary to drive these changes, as the solvated pseudo membrane induces this same result. This outcome depends on the stability of the protein interaction, as a parameterization with exceptionally stable binding in 3D does not improve in 2D. Our approach provides simple metrics to move beyond rigid-body estimates of 2D affinities and fully assess whether allosteric effects stabilize dimerization on membranes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.