ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2025
Retrospective analysis of influences of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with diabetes with poorly controlled blood pressure in Japan.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor in response to the article 'Retrospective analysis of influences of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with diabetes with poorly controlled blood pressure in Japan'.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsAchieving optimal blood pressure control remains challenging, particularly for patients with diabetes. This post-hoc study compared the efficacy and safety of switching to sacubitril/valsartan vs adding thiazide diuretics in this population.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with diabetes and inadequate blood pressure control in the office or home settings despite combination therapy with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and calcium channel blockers. Patients were categorized into those receiving an additional thiazide diuretic (THZ group, n = 136) and those switching to sacubitril/valsartan (SacVal group, n = 199). The treatment effects over 12 months were analyzed using propensity score analysis with inverse probability weighting. Treatment discontinuation rates were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsIn the propensity score analysis model, target pressure achievement rates were similar between the two groups. However, compared to the THZ group, the SacVal group exhibited significantly lower uric acid levels (P < 0.001), improved glycated hemoglobin A
conclusionsThe combination of sacubitril/valsartan with calcium channel blockers provided a similar reduction in blood pressure compared with thiazide with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and calcium channel blockers, and reported more favorable changes in uric acid levels, glycated hemoglobin A
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.