ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2025
The Natural History Study and Biomarker Collection of the Clinical Research Consortium for the Study of Cerebellar Ataxia (CRC-SCA).
Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01060371 (Clinical Research Consortium for the Study of Cerebellar Ataxias), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Research Consortium for the Study of Cerebellar Ataxias (CRC-SCA) for the Natural History Study of and Genetic Modifiers in Spinocerebellar Ataxias (SCA)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI end-points for clinical trials in ataxias: recommendations from the Ataxia Global Initiative MRI Biomarkers Working Group.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Neurochemical Endpoints to Inform Early-Stage Trials of Spinocerebellar Ataxia 2 and 3 in a Multisite Setting.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- An International Survey of Patients with Ataxia: Trends in Patient-Reported Symptoms.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Predicting disease progression in progressive cerebellar ataxias: integrating clinical, imaging, fluid, genetic, and digital biomarkers.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
46 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hereditary ataxias are progressive neurodegenerative disorders primarily affecting the cerebellum. Since 2009, the Clinical Research Consortium for the Study of Cerebellar Ataxias (CRC-SCA) has studied the natural history of common types of spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs). The CRC-SCA is a 17-site academic collaboration supported by the National Ataxia Foundation. In 2024, the CRC-SCA expanded its scope by incorporating newly identified late-onset ataxias, including repeat expansion mutations in RFC1 and FGF14 causing Cerebellar Ataxia with Neuropathy and Vestibular Areflexia Syndrome (CANVAS) and SCA27B, respectively. These ongoing efforts have enriched the understanding of disease progression and facilitated access to biofluid and neuroimaging data for biomarker discovery, setting the stage for therapeutic development in hereditary ataxias. The CRC-SCA's natural history study and biomarker collection have validated several clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to capture important aspects of hereditary ataxias. We have also developed new COAs for cognitive and patient-reported outcome measures. A key component of the study includes biofluid collection-cerebrospinal fluid, plasma, and serum-to identify molecular biomarkers for disease progression and therapeutic response. Additionally, an incorporated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) substudy provides critical imaging biomarkers, enhancing our ability to track macro- and microstructural, chemical and functional changes in the cerebellum and relate these to clinical presentations. The comprehensive, longitudinal dataset comprising COAs, biofluid biomarkers, and neuroimaging enhances clinical trial readiness in the field and accelerates therapeutic advancements for hereditary ataxias. This review highlights the collective efforts of CRC-SCA, details the study protocol, and emphasizes the integrity and specificity of the collected data elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.