ReviewCNS drugs2025
Multiple Sclerosis in People of Diverse Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds: Presentation, Disease Course, and Interactions with Disease-Modifying Therapy.
Review in CNS drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Migration status, country of origin and long-term outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a Swedish nationwide study.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Article
- Refining Prognostic Factors in Adult-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of Current Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Factors associated with delays in multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy initiation.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects people of all racial and ethnic backgrounds, with greatest prevalence noted in Black and white individuals living in Europe and North America. Age of MS onset seems to be earlier in Black, Latino/Hispanic, and South Asian people living with MS in North America and the United Kingdom. Additionally, Black and Latino/Hispanic people with MS in the USA are more likely to have severe initial presentations and earlier accumulation of disability compared with white people with MS. Evidence is sparse concerning how efficacy and safety of disease-modifying therapies for MS may vary with race and ethnicity, largely due to underrepresentation of racial and ethnic diversity in clinical trials. Social determinants of health such as sex, income, education, and the built environment interact with race and ethnicity to affect delays in MS diagnosis, use of therapy, and disease outcomes. In general, considering earlier disability progression, barriers to treatment access and adherence, and existing drug efficacy data, there may be even greater reason to consider early high efficacy therapy in underrepresented populations. More research and targeted interventions are needed to improve outcomes for people of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds living with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40679779What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.