ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
An open-source nanopore-only sequencing workflow for analysis of clonal outbreaks delivers short-read level accuracy.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanopore Sequencing for Chikungunya Virus: Principles and Application.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Draft genomes of 53Microbiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Resolving plasmid-encoded carbapenem resistance dynamics and reservoirs in a hospital setting through nanopore sequencing.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Oxford Nanopore Sequencing in pediatric emergency infectious diseases: from rapid diagnosis to precision medicine.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Multi-platform metagenomic characterization of the microbial community during spontaneous cacao fermentation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we present an optimized nanopore long-read only sequencing workflow for epidemiologic analysis of clonal outbreaks built with open-source tools. A set of unrelated clinical IMPORTANCE: For the past decade, bacterial whole-genome sequencing has been performed using high-accuracy short-read sequencing. More recently, long-read sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) instruments has emerged as a potential alternative based on multiple advantages, including lower costs, portability, and speed. However, this platform has suffered from basecall error rates that were too high for many applications in clinical microbiology, including outbreak tracing. With the release of new flow cell chemistries and basecall algorithms, the accuracy has improved dramatically, making this approach feasible for outbreak investigations. In this work, we optimize a streamlined nanopore-only workflow for epidemiologic analysis of bacterial pathogens. The workflow was validated with isolates from four previously identified clinical outbreaks with varying GC content and demonstrated fully concordant cgMLST clustering as compared to short-read references. This workflow will facilitate the broader implementation of ONT-only genomes and cgMLST analysis to assist in hospital outbreaks worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.