Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679938›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2025

Think Syphilis: Evaluating Testing and Treatment Services for Pregnant Women Attending Prenatal Care in Maricopa County, Arizona.

Layla Gabir, Jonathan Bell, Aisha Praag, Margarita Rios, Stephanie Devlin, Renuka Khurana, Melanie M Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Layla GabirFrom the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Community Health & Records Services Division.ORCID 0009-0006-0948-1746
Jonathan BellFrom the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Community Health & Records Services Division.
Aisha PraagFrom the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Community Health & Records Services Division.
Margarita RiosFrom the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Community Health & Records Services Division.
Stephanie DevlinFrom the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Community Health & Records Services Division.
Renuka KhuranaFrom the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Community Health & Records Services Division.
Melanie M Taylor

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArizona has had one of the highest rates of congenital syphilis in the nation in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate compliance with mandated 3 time-point syphilis testing for pregnant women attending prenatal care, describe access to benzathine penicillin G (BPG) treatment, and assess receipt and use of Think Syphilis campaign materials in Maricopa County, AZ.

methodsA facility-level cross-sectional survey was performed among prenatal care providers and clinical staff in 2022 to 2023. Responses from individual participants were applied to their facilities, including respective satellite offices within their corporations.

resultsResponses from 42 distinct health care facilities were included, representing 104 outpatient obstetrician-gynecologist clinical settings. These facilities represented 232 delivering providers accounting for 33,196 live births, approximately 68.0% of all reported live births in Maricopa County for 2021. Of the 42, 41 (97.6%) reported use of syphilis screening policies for pregnant women. Reported compliance with performing prenatal syphilis testing was 78.6% (33 of 42) for syphilis at first prenatal care visit and 73.8% (31 of 42) during the third trimester. Among providers with first-hand knowledge of hospital-based screening practices, 76.5% (13 of 17) reported syphilis screening at delivery. Only 11.9% (5 of 42) reported on-site clinic-based administration of BPG; 71.4% (30 of 42) reported referring syphilis patients to an external site for treatment with BPG. Barriers to on-site treatment included cost and perception of syphilis as rare. The Maricopa County STI Clinic was the most reported treatment referral site by 90.5% (19 of 21) of respondents. Regarding the Think Syphilis campaign, 21.4% (9 of 42) confirmed receipt of campaign materials, and of these 77.8% (7 of 9) shared materials with office staff.

conclusionsReported performance of 3 time point syphilis testing for pregnant women attending prenatal care in Maricopa County is substantial. However, clinic-based barriers to on-site BPG administration exist. This survey afforded an opportunity to educate providers and clinic staff on maternal syphilis testing and treatment using the Think Syphilis campaign.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CareSyphilisSyphilis, CongenitalAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsArizonaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMass ScreeningPenicillin G BenzathinePregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillin G Benzathine

Identifiers

PMID40679938
PMCPMC12374722

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.