ArticleScientific reports2025
Neural responsivity to food cues varies with food fussiness in adolescents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations between early childhood appetitive traits and dietary diversity in school-age children: a two-year longitudinal follow-up study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Food fussiness (picky eating) increases risk for poor nutrition and eating disorders but its biological underpinnings are not understood. We aimed to investigate behavioral (observed as well as parent- and self-reported), and neural (using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)) correlates of food fussiness. Adolescents completed an fMRI task during which they viewed photos of fruits and vegetables [F&V], high energy-density [High-ED] foods, and Non-foods. Following scanning, they completed a multi-item ad libitum meal [ALM], then an Eating in the Absence of Hunger [EAH] test. Parents completed the Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire [CEBQ]. Adolescents reported habitual dietary intake using a 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24). Adolescents were categorized based on CEBQ Food Fussiness [FF] scores, such that scores ≥ 3 = high FF (n = 23), and scores ≤ 2 = low FF (n = 28). The high vs. low FF group reported lower wanting for F&V stimuli in the fMRI task and consumed lower absolute and relative intake of F&V at the ALM, while ASA24 data also demonstrated greater % total kcal intake from added sugar. Adolescents with high FF demonstrated activation that was consistent with decreased approach toward F&V and increased approach toward High-ED foods. Neuroimaging results demonstrated differential responses to F&V and high-ED stimuli among adolescents with high food fussiness, providing preliminary evidence for a neural signature of food fussiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.