Evidence mapPaperPMID 40681585Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Neural responsivity to food cues varies with food fussiness in adolescents.

Sarah Ann Duck, Elena Jansen, Liuyi Chen, Shuxian Hua, Allison Ahn, Leora Benson, Afroditi Papantoni, Susan Carnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah Ann DuckDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elena JansenDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Liuyi ChenDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Shuxian HuaDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Allison AhnDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Leora BensonDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Afroditi PapantoniDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susan CarnellDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. susan.carnell@jhmi.edu.

Funding

Early Brain Development and Childhood ObesityR01DK113286 · NIDDK · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI Susan Carnell, Viren Andrew D'Sa · 2023 to 2023
$527k
NIH HHS R01DK113286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food fussiness (picky eating) increases risk for poor nutrition and eating disorders but its biological underpinnings are not understood. We aimed to investigate behavioral (observed as well as parent- and self-reported), and neural (using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)) correlates of food fussiness. Adolescents completed an fMRI task during which they viewed photos of fruits and vegetables [F&V], high energy-density [High-ED] foods, and Non-foods. Following scanning, they completed a multi-item ad libitum meal [ALM], then an Eating in the Absence of Hunger [EAH] test. Parents completed the Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire [CEBQ]. Adolescents reported habitual dietary intake using a 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24). Adolescents were categorized based on CEBQ Food Fussiness [FF] scores, such that scores ≥ 3 = high FF (n = 23), and scores ≤ 2 = low FF (n = 28). The high vs. low FF group reported lower wanting for F&V stimuli in the fMRI task and consumed lower absolute and relative intake of F&V at the ALM, while ASA24 data also demonstrated greater % total kcal intake from added sugar. Adolescents with high FF demonstrated activation that was consistent with decreased approach toward F&V and increased approach toward High-ED foods. Neuroimaging results demonstrated differential responses to F&V and high-ED stimuli among adolescents with high food fussiness, providing preliminary evidence for a neural signature of food fussiness.

Indexed as

BrainCuesFeeding BehaviorAdolescentChildFemaleFoodHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesDietary compositionFood choiceFood decision-makingFood rewardNeuroimagingPicky eatingSatiety

Identifiers

PMID40681585
PMCPMC12274482

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.