Trial reportScientific reports2025
The effect of different exercise modalities on older adults' quality of life: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preliminary Effects of a Multicomponent Exercise Program Delivered in Conventional and Snoezelen Rooms Among Older Women Attending Social Centers: A Non-Randomized Pilot Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Physical Fitness Index for Older Adults in a Chinese Retirement Community.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Serum 8-OHdG as a Marker of Oxidative DNA Damage in Acute Exacerbations of COPD: Associations with GOLD Stage and Smoking Status-A Cross Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Impact of adherence to six-month home-based HIIT on cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Associations of resistance liuzijue qigong with sleep and mood in chronic insomnia: a pilot open-label Non-randomized trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This assessor-blinded randomized trial was designed to evaluate the effects of aerobic exercise, resistance training, and traditional Chinese gong methods on the quality of life (QoL) of older adults aged 66-96 years living in a nursing facility. Seventy - eight participants, who were over 65 years old, free from severe heart disease, asthma, and other conditions specified in the exclusion criteria, were randomly allocated into three groups to receive 12-24 weeks of different exercise interventions. The SF - 36 Health Survey Scale was employed to assess QoL before the intervention and 12 and 24 weeks after it. The results indicated that all three exercise modalities significantly increased the SF - 36 total score. The aerobic exercise group demonstrated improvements in Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS), Role Physical(RP), and Role Emotional (RE). The resistance training group showed enhancements in MCS, Physical Functioning (PF), Social Functioning (SF), RE, and Mental Health (MH). The traditional gong group achieved progress in PCS, MCS, PF, RP, Bodily Pain (BP), and Vitality (VT). In summary, all three exercise types effectively enhanced the QoL of older adults. Aerobic and resistance training were beneficial for both physical and psychological aspects, while traditional gong methods mainly had a positive impact on physical functioning. Although the study lacked a non-intervention control group, based on these results, this study not only provides a scientific basis for the development of exercise intervention programs for the elderly but also offers practical suggestions for designing exercise plans, contributing to promoting healthy aging.Trial registration: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 19/10/2022, (ChiCTR2200064801).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.