ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2026
Myocardial infarction, stroke and arterial stenosis: time to reassess a major misunderstanding.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanopriming by vascular stiffness and phenotypic reprogramming by disturbed flow: mechanobiology and clinical translation in atherosclerosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Photon-counting CT characterization of carotid perivascular adipose tissue: a layer-by-layer quantitative analysis. A preliminary analysis in an asymptomatic population.European radiology · 2026Article
- Covert macrovascular disease and early outcome after ischemic cerebrovascular events.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Observational
- Celastrol ameliorates atherosclerosis by inhibiting TLR4/STAT3/NLRP3-mediated macrophage pyroptosis.Chinese medicine · 2026Article
- Myocardial ischemia: no supply/demand mismatch but reduced blood flow per beat.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Review
- Microbiota-innate immune crosstalk drives atherosclerosis: mechanisms, disease progression, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Hunting for a coronary artery disease diagnosis in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus: if, how and when.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A misconception persisting among the scientific and clinical communities relates to the correlation between arterial stenosis and acute ischaemic events, including myocardial infarction and cerebral stroke. This Perspective article challenges the approach that most of the current guidelines codify, which is based on the concept that occlusive arterial stenosis generally provokes ischaemic events. We highlight the mechanistic differences between chronic or inducible ischaemia caused by flow-limiting stenoses and acute thrombotic events and question the traditional reliance on stenosis grading as a biomarker for therapeutic decision-making that many guidelines enshrine. Furthermore, we review the latest evidence highlighting the lack of a correlation between stenosis severity and the occurrence of acute thrombotic complications of atherosclerosis, in the light of a major clinical trial that included a large contemporary population and showed that only one-third of major adverse cardiovascular events occur in individuals with obstructive coronary artery disease. These considerations aim to foster a shift, grounded in contemporary evidence, towards treatment approaches that address modifying plaque biology rather than stenoses per se, using pharmacological treatment as a fundamental factor in risk mitigation and moving away from sole reliance on stenosis grading as a primary determinant of therapeutic decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40681707What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.