ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and performance verification of an isometric dynamometer for lower extremity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inter-Session Reliability of an Isometric Muscle Strength Protocol in Older Adults.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lower limb isometric strength is crucial for predicting diseases, monitoring rehabilitation, and assessing activity levels. Manual testing lacks quantitative evaluation, while handheld dynamometers (HHDs) require skilled raters and isokinetic dynamometers are expensive and complex. Existing devices often focus on single-joint measurements for specific populations. To address the need for multi-joint quantitative muscle strength assessment, along with portability, affordability, and ease of use, this study developed the isometric dynamometer for the lower extremity (IDLE) to measure hip flexion, knee extension, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion strength. Its validity and reliability were evaluated in 20 healthy adults (50% female). The IDLE demonstrated excellent validity compared to a strap-fixed HHD (Pearson's r ≥ 0.907, ICC ≥ 0.908, P < 0.01). Intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.926) for male knee extension (bilateral), left knee flexion, and right ankle dorsiflexion; as well as for female right hip flexion, knee extension (bilateral), and right knee flexion, and good (ICC ≥ 0.808) for other measurements. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.901) for all measurements except male right ankle dorsiflexion. The IDLE is a valid and reliable device for measuring lower extremity isometric strength in healthy adults, with further validation in clinical populations recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.