ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Coronary plaque healing: a safety net or a hazard indicator?
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary atherosclerotic plaques can lead to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) occurrence through three main mechanisms: plaque rupture, plaque erosion and calcified nodule. Many destabilized plaques, however, do not cause cardiovascular events. Instead, thrombus formation is confined, lumen patency is preserved and the arterial wall is restored in a process termed as plaque healing. Early studies regarding coronary plaque healing used arterial specimens to determine its prevalence and histological characteristics. Advances in imaging modalities later enabled the implementation of in vivo studies, which have used optical coherence tomography (OCT) to identify the repaired plaques. They are visualized as lesions with a heterogeneous signal-rich layered or multilayered pattern and a distinct optical density from underlying plaque components. On one hand, plaque healing acts as a protective mechanism against myocardial infarction and unstable angina. On the other hand, the presence of layered plaques indicates previous plaque destabilization and therefore increased cardiovascular risk. Clinicians ought to bear these in mind in order to better apply patient risk stratification and adjust medical interventions. The aim of this review is to discuss the physiology of coronary plaque healing, determine its prevalence and clinical significance, as well as propose possible pathophysiological mechanisms behind impaired plaque healing along with therapeutic options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.