Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682278›Full record

ArticleCancer2025

Prostate cancer incidence and outcomes among Vietnam veterans receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration.

Ashley-Marie Y Green-Lott, Ananta Wadhwa, Anissa V Bailey, Lorna Kwan, Candace L Haroldsen, Jeremy B Shelton, Michael S Lewis, David O Beenhouwer, Karim Chamie, Brent S Rose and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ashley-Marie Y Green-LottVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ananta WadhwaVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Anissa V BaileyDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Lorna KwanDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Candace L HaroldsenUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jeremy B SheltonVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Michael S LewisVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1892-4127
David O BeenhouwerVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Karim ChamieDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Brent S RoseVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3197-9552
Kara N MaxwellDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nicholas G NickolsVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Kosj YamoahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-3538
Michael J KelleyDepartment of Veteran Affairs, National Oncology Program, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Timothy R RebbeckDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4799-1900
Martin SchoenVA St. Louis Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-5553
Matthew B RettigVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Hari S IyerVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Isla P GarrawayVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1129-4636

Funding

UCLA SPORE IN PROSTATE CANCERP50CA092131 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI REITER, ROBERT E · 2002 to 2023
$42.6M
A genotype-phenotype study of tumors from patients with inherited mutations in DNA repair genesK08CA215312 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAXWELL, KARA N · 2018 to 2022
$924k
Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Prostate Cancer: Opportunities for Prevention and Early DetectionK01ES035734 · NIEHS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Hari S Iyer · 2024 to 2026
$555k
Association of VA Surgeons 85479NCI NIH HHS K08 CA215312NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092131NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES035734Prostate Cancer Foundation PCFCHAL02US Department of Veterans Affairs CSR&D W1810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgent Orange exposure (AOE) is considered a presumptive cause of prostate cancer (PCa) in the Veterans Affairs (VA) population; however, cohort studies reported inconsistent associations of AOE and PCa incidence and outcomes. In this nationwide cohort study, Vietnam veterans who received VA care were evaluated for associations of AOE and PCa incidence and adverse outcomes.

methodsVietnam veterans 17-25 years old during military service (1962-1971) who received VA health care between 2005 and 2020 were stratified by presumptive AOE assigned by the VA and followed until death from any cause or censoring on September 31, 2023. Multivariable Cox models permitted estimation of adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of AOE with PCa incidence, de novo metastasis (DNM), any metastasis, metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), all-cause mortality (ACM), or PCa-specific mortality (PCSM).

resultsAmong 2.6 million Vietnam veterans at risk for PCa, 779,472 (30%) had AOE. Compared to unexposed veterans, AOE veterans had higher PCa risk (aHR, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.16), higher DNM (aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.16-1.17), any metastasis (aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.16-1.17), mCRPC (aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.16-1.17), ACM (aHR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.41-1.42), and PCSM (aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.16-1.17) in adjusted models. Sensitivity analyses suggested robustness of association between AOE and all-cause mortality, but selection bias could explain associations with PCa outcomes.

conclusionsPresumptive AOE was associated with higher PCa incidence, mortality, and adverse outcomes. Although associations may not be causal, AOE may predict worse PCa outcomes in the Veterans Affairs.

Indexed as

Agent OrangeProstatic NeoplasmsVeteransAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans HealthVietnam ConflictYoung AdultAgent OrangeAgent Orangemilitary exposuresprostate cancerVietnam veterans

Identifiers

PMID40682278
PMCPMC12274657

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.