Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682465›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025

Women's participation in mobile phone surveys in Mozambique: Findings from a qualitative study.

Rosemary Morgan, Yolanda Manganhe, Celso Monjane, Milly Nakatabira, Helen Kuo, Cremildo Manhiça, Ferão Mandlate, Milton Sengo, Midalia Uamba, Almamy Malick Kante and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rosemary MorganDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5009-8470
Yolanda ManganheInstituto Nacional de Saude, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1756-7982
Celso MonjaneInstituto Nacional de Saude, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5766-9643
Milly NakatabiraDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2562-7382
Helen KuoDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2589-3656
Cremildo ManhiçaInstituto Nacional de Saude, Maputo, Mozambique.
Ferão MandlateInstituto Nacional de Saude, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4893-6576
Milton SengoInstituto Nacional de Saude, Maputo, Mozambique.
Midalia UambaInstituto Nacional de Saude, Maputo, Mozambique.
Almamy Malick KanteDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ivalda MacicameInstituto Nacional de Saude, Maputo, Mozambique.
Agbessi AmouzouDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6262-3866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe use of mobile phone surveys in low- and middle-income countries is increasing as a low-cost and rapid alternative to in-person interviews. However, ensuring they are representative of women and, when women are included reducing potential response bias and harm are important considerations. To improve women's participation in phone surveys, we conducted a qualitative study in Mozambique to better understand women's experiences of participating in mobile phone surveys.

methodsThis study was part of the Rapid Mortality Mobile Phone Survey (RaMMPS) project implemented in Mozambique to test the use of mobile phone interviews for childhood mortality measurement at the national level. We conducted a qualitative study with 32 women who had previously participated in the RAMMPS mobile phone survey. Interviews were conducted both in-person and over the phone. Thematic analysis was done manually using the Framework approach.

resultsGender-related considerations that emerged from the data regarding women's participation included women's access to mobile phones, the reduced time burden and convenience of participating in mobile phone interviews compared to in-person interviews, difficulties ensuring privacy in mobile phone surveys, the effect of the interviewer's gender on participant responses, and women's safety concerns.

conclusionImportant considerations for including women in mobile phone surveys relate to efforts to reduce response bias and mitigate harm, such as ensuring privacy and considering the gender of the data collector. Addressing these issues is crucial to improving women's participation and experience in mobile phone surveys.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedMozambiqueQualitative ResearchYoung Adultgendermobile phone surveyswomen's participation

Identifiers

PMID40682465
PMCPMC12401626

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.