Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682838›Full record

ReviewOncology reports2025

O‑GlcNAcylation as an emerging molecular target for cholangiocarcinoma therapy (Review).

Purin Charoensuksai, Siwanon Jirawatnotai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Purin CharoensuksaiDepartment of Biomedicine and Health Informatics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom 73000, Thailand.
Siwanon JirawatnotaiSiriraj Center of Research Excellence for Precision Medicine and Systems Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant O‑GlcNAcylation and the upregulation of O‑GlcNAc transferase (OGT) are key contributors to cancer pathogenesis and progression, driving hyperproliferative states and metastatic phenotypes. Targeting OGT may suppress cancer progression, positioning OGT and O‑GlcNAc signaling as compelling targets in cancer research. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a rare yet highly aggressive malignancy of the bile duct system, represents a clinical challenge, underscored by its rising global mortality, poor survival outcomes and high recurrence rate, despite advances in awareness, diagnostics and therapeutic strategies. Consequently, there is need for novel therapeutic modalities. Hyperactive O‑GlcNAcylation and upregulation of OGT are observed in CCA, therefore, targeting protein O‑GlcNAcylation may have clinical potential. The present review aimed to summarize the impact of O‑GlcNAcylation on CCA and CCA‑relevant hallmarks of cancer including cell proliferation, metastasis, metabolic reprogramming, angiogenesis, programmed cell death and tumor‑associated inflammation. In areas where direct evidence in CCA is limited, insights from other gastrointestinal tract cancers may identify potential mechanistic connections, offering a broader context to guide future investigation. Furthermore, the viability of OGT and O‑GlcNAcylation as therapeutic targets is discussed.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaN-AcetylglucosaminyltransferasesAnimalsCell ProliferationGlycosylationHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSignal TransductionN-AcetylglucosaminyltransferasesO-GlcNAc transferasecancer precision medicinecholangio-carcinomaO‑GlcNAc transferaseO‑GlcNAcylationO‑GlcNAcylation‑targeted therapysugar metabolism in cancer

Identifiers

PMID40682838
PMCPMC12308815

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.