ArticleJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2026
Development and validation of risk models for hospital-acquired bleeding in medical inpatients: the Medical Inpatients Thrombosis and Hemostasis (MITH) study.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a risk assessment model for hospital-acquired venous thrombosis in medical in-patients with cancer.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHospital-acquired (HA) bleeding in medical inpatients is a serious complication with limited tools to predict risk.
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate risk assessment models (RAMs) for anatomic location-specific HA bleeding in medical inpatients using objective and routinely available risk factors.
methodsPatients aged ≥18 years admitted to medical hospital services from 6 health systems and 15 hospitals in the United States between 2016 and 2020 for at least 1 midnight and without bleeding at admission were eligible for inclusion. Two health systems (10 hospitals) formed the development cohort, and 4 systems (5 hospitals) constituted the validation cohort. Bayesian Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used to develop anatomic site-specific RAMs.
resultsAmong the development (153 707 admissions) and validation (137 460 admissions) cohorts, 5999 (3.9%) and 3282 (2.4%) HA bleeds occurred. RAMs had varied risk factors by anatomic bleeding location; for instance, older age was associated with genitourinary bleeding in men but not in women. Different cancer types were associated with different anatomic bleeding locations such as genitourinary cancers associated with genitourinary bleeding and gynecologic bleeding. The RAMs demonstrated good predictive performance for most anatomical bleeding locations; the C-statistic was ≥0.67 for all anatomic location bleeding in the development and validation cohorts and generally higher in the anatomic location specific RAMs.
conclusionThese RAMs provide anatomic location-specific and sex-specific HA-bleeding risk stratification, addressing a critical gap in individualized risk assessment. Integration into clinical workflows could enhance patient safety and outcomes. Implementation studies are essential to maximize their clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.