Trial reportBMC geriatrics2025
Inappropriate vitamin D supplementation among multimorbid older patients: a multicountry analysis.
Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02986425 (OPERAM), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
OPERAM: OPtimising thERapy to Prevent Avoidable Hospital Admissions in the Multimorbid Older People: a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global under- and overprescribing of drugs-a scoping review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Article
- Vitamin D Deficiency in Institutionalized Older Adults: Associations with Supplementation Practices but Not with Cognitive Decline or Dementia.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Vitamin D in Cardiovascular Medicine: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of vitamin D supplementation and the percentage of participants with a lack of appropriate vitamin D supplementation ("potential underuse") or potentially inappropriate vitamin D supplementation ("potential overuse") and risk factors for these are currently unclear.
methodsCross-sectional analysis from the OPERAM study, a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial in four European countries (Belgium, Ireland, The Netherlands, Switzerland) including multimorbid (≥ 3 chronic conditions) older patients, with polypharmacy (≥ 5 chronic medications). For the definition of potential underuse and overuse we used high-risk conditions, which were defined according to the START criteria (version 2) for potential prescribing omissions in older people i.e., E2) long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy, known osteoporosis or osteopenia, E3) previous fragility fractures, and E5) housebound/in nursing homes or experiencing falls. We used mixed effect logistic regression to identify factors associated with underuse and overuse.
results2008 patients (79.4y, SD 6.3, 45% female) were included. 825/2008 (41.1%) were supplemented with vitamin D. We identified 681 participants with potential underuse (33.9% of all participants, 69.7% of non-vitamin D users) and 204 with potential overuse (10.2% of all participants, 24.7% of vitamin D users). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis increasing age and being male were associated with underuse, while the number of baseline medications and previous hospitalizations were associated with both underuse and overuse. Specifically, underuse decreased with an increasing number of medications (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90-0.95), while overuse increased (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.12). Previous hospitalizations were linked to underuse (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00-1.17) and inversely associated with overuse (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77-0.99).
conclusionsOne-third of multimorbid older adults experienced potential underuse, while up to 10% potential overuse of vitamin D supplementation. Polypharmacy, previous hospitalizations, increasing age and being male are factors associated with inappropriate use of vitamin D. A better targeted vitamin D supplementation is warranted.
trial registrationNCT02986425, Registration date 2016-10-21.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.