ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2025
Role of frailty in predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to determine the association between frailty, as measured by the five-item modified frailty index (mFI-5), and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and to explore the predictive value of frailty beyond traditional PPC risk factors.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we collected baseline and perioperative data of older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) undergoing major abdominal surgery in a tertiary hospital. The association between the mFI-5 score and PPCs was examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Additionally, the predictive value of the mFI-5 beyond the four basic PPC risk models was estimated using discrimination (areas under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROCs]; DeLong's test), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test), goodness of fit (likelihood ratio χ2 test), explained variance (Nagelkerke R2), and reclassification (categorical and continuous net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement).
resultsA total of 3298 patients were included, of whom 351 (10.6%) developed PPCs. After adjusting for confounding factors, higher mFI-5 scores were independently associated with an increased risk of PPCs compared with a score of 0 (all P < 0.05). Incorporating the mFI-5 score into the basic PPC risk models significantly improved the AUROC, goodness of fit, and risk reclassification (all P < 0.001); enhanced or maintained calibration (all P > 0.05); and increased explained variance.
conclusionsFrailty, measured using the mFI-5, was independently associated with an increased risk of PPCs and improved the predictive performance of conventional risk factors for PPCs in older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.