ReviewAnimal microbiome2025
Fecal microbiota transplantation in pigs: current status and future perspective.
Review in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fecal virome transplantation alleviates weaning stress-induced behavioral alterations and intestinal health by reshaping the gut microbiome.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Human Microbiota-Associated Pig Models for Translational Microbiome Research: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- The hologenome concept and its implications for animal breeding in the multi-omics Era.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Intestinal microbiota dynamics in piglets: the interplay with swine enteric coronavirus infections and implications for disease control.Animal microbiome · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is gaining attention as a method to modulate the gut microbiome in pigs, with the goal of enhancing health and production outcomes. While some studies indicate that FMT can enhance growth performance and intestinal health in piglets, others report minimal or even negative effects. This variability highlights the need for standardized protocols and further research to optimize FMT for swine applications. Currently, the use of FMT in pigs is still in its early stages, with limited studies showing considerable methodological differences. Although some evidence supports the effectiveness of FMT, significant gaps remain in our understanding of its approach and underlying mechanisms. Therefore, this review summarizes the role and development of gut microbiota in pigs, analyzes existing FMT research in pigs, emphasizes the varying outcomes, illustrates the potential mechanisms of action based on human and animal studies and discusses the innovative potential of using co-evolved microbial communities as a transplant material. As our understanding of pig gut microbiome advances, FMT and related microbiome-based interventions could become valuable tools in pig production. However, ongoing research is essential to elucidate their mechanisms and develop reliable protocols.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.