ArticleScientific reports2025
Statine-based peptidomimetics as SARS-CoV-2 Papain-like protease inhibitors: in Silico and in vitro studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated statin-based peptidomimetic compounds as inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLpro) by in silico methods, including molecular docking/dynamic simulations and ADMET prediction, as well as enzymatic in vitro assays. Five compounds (LQMed 426, 428, 430, 431, and 432) were identified as having promising interactions with the active site and an allosteric site of PLpro. The docking poses in the active site revealed that the compounds interacted with the catalytic triad (Cys111, His272, and Asp286). Compound 426 stood out for forming significant hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds. In molecular dynamic (MD) simulations, there was a tendency for the compounds to migrate to a pocket in the ubiquitin-like (Ubl) domain region, indicating possible allosteric inhibition. Principal component analysis (PCA) and free energy landscape (FEL) plot showed significant differences in the conformational stability of protein-ligand complexes. Complex 432 had the highest stability (PC1: 24.9%, PC2: 10.5%) with restricted movements, while complex 430 had the lowest stability and the highest PC1, indicating broader movements. Complexes 426 and 428 had intermediate stability. FEL analysis confirmed that complex 432 had multiple minimum energy clusters, suggesting a greater likelihood of stable enzyme-ligand complex. In vitro assays demonstrated that all compounds inhibited PLpro activity by at least 50%, with IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.