ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025
Hidden Cardiovascular Risk: Arterial Stiffness and Left Ventricular Remodeling as Potential Indicators of Masked Hypertension.
Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-dependent epigenomic and transcriptomic reprogramming links maternal obesity to cardiac remodeling in adult offspring.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026Article
- Arterial stiffness index and blood pressure phenotypes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prognostic implications for ischemic and bleeding events.Clinical hypertension · 2026Article
- Correlation Between Cardiac Troponin Serum Concentration and Selected Parameters of Subclinical Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Patients With and Without Arterial Hypertension: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Real-World Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Masked hypertension (MH), characterized by normal office blood pressure (OBP) but elevated out-of-office readings, carries significant cardiovascular risks comparable to those of sustained hypertension, but remains difficult to detect in clinical practice. This review examines the emerging evidence on screening for MH, highlighting recent findings from the PAMELA study demonstrating the clinical utility of combined vascular and cardiac assessments for the detection of MH. Particularly noteworthy is the observation that patients with both an elevated cardiac-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) or concentric remodeling had a 2.3-fold increased risk of MH, particularly in men, independent of age and antihypertensive treatment. CAVI offers distinct advantages as a screening parameter due to its independence from blood pressure fluctuations during measurement, its established prognostic value for cardiovascular outcomes, and its high reproducibility in primary care. We propose a stepwise screening approach, prioritizing CAVI assessment in patients with normal OBP but multiple cardiovascular risk factors, followed by echocardiographic assessment in those with elevated CAVI values. This strategy may facilitate earlier detection of MH, allowing timely intervention to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, although further validation in different age groups and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.