Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40685869›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

Analysis of ALPS-Index: Difference in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With or Without Mild Cognitive Impairment and Its Relationship With Hippocampal Microstructure.

Ziyu Diao, Xuan Huang, Die Shen, Kun Wang, Jiahe Wang, Kui Zhao, Chen Zhao, Zidong Cao, Xin Tan, Shijun Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ziyu DiaoThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9277-4828
Xuan HuangThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Die ShenThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Kun WangThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jiahe WangThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Kui ZhaoThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chen ZhaoMR Research Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers, Guangzhou, China.
Zidong CaoThe First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xin TanDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shijun QiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82330058National Natural Science Foundation of China T2341014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with cognitive impairment has a high incidence rate globally, and there is a need to investigate the relationship among the glymphatic system, hippocampus microstructure, and cognition in T2DM. The present study aims to delineate changes in the perivascular space index (ALPS-index) among T2DM patients with different cognitive states and investigate any possible correlation between the ALPS-index and the diffusive indicators of the bilateral hippocampi in T2DM. In addition, we seek to identify specific cognitive domains with substantial correlation with the ALPS-index in the general population.

methodsA total of 113 participants were recruited, comprising 37 T2DM patients with normal cognitive function (DMNC), 39 T2DM patients with mild cognitive impairment (DMMCI), and 37 healthy controls (HC). Clinical information, neuropsychological assessments, and experienced multimodal magnetic resonance imaging scans were recorded from all the participants. A noninvasive method was applied to obtain all ALPS-index measures, such as the left, right, and average ALPS-index, along with diffusive indicators of the bilateral hippocampi, comprising fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD).

resultsA statistically marginal difference in the average ALPS-index was noted among HC, DMNC, and DMMCI groups. According to binary logistic regression analysis results, the average ALPS-index significantly altered the cognitive function in T2DM. Partial correlation analyses revealed a positive association between the average ALPS-index and FA, as well as a negative association with MD and RD in the bilateral hippocampi of the T2DM groups. In the general population, partial correlation analysis indicated that the average ALPS-index correlated with the auditory verbal learning test (AVLT) immediate recall scores.

conclusionIn summary, our findings demonstrated that glymphatic system function in the brain progressively deteriorates with worsening cognitive impairment among T2DM patients. Moreover, T2DM significantly disrupts the relationship patterns between the glymphatic system and bilateral hippocampal microstructure. Thus, the mean ALPS-index may act as a novel neuroimaging biomarker for assessing cognitive function in T2DM.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glymphatic SystemHippocampusAgedCognitionDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsALPS‐indexcognitionglymphatic systemhippocampal microstructuremagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)type 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID40685869
PMCPMC12277526

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.