ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2025
Minibeam Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Mucosal Melanoma: An Eye-Opening Response.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Roadmap for the implementation of particle minibeam therapy.Medical physics · 2026Review
- Spatially fractionated radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a synergistic strategy for systemic anti-tumor immunity.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Experimental characterization of proton minibeam therapy delivery under FLASH dose-rate conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancing Proton Therapy: Integration of Minibeam Spatial Fractionation and FLASH Dose Rates.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case of novel radiation treatment referred to as minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) that was used to treat recurrent mucosal melanoma. The patient's disease recurred after surgery, conventional radiation therapy, and 4 lines of systemic therapy, and then, the patient was referred to our clinic. Despite substantial disease progression after multiple prior therapies, a complete metabolic and clinical response, along with an improved quality of life and performance status, was achieved after 2 treatments of MBRT. Additionally, disease response was noted in an unirradiated abdominal metastasis. The MBRT treatments were well-tolerated, with minimal toxicity reported more than 6 months posttreatment. This case highlights the potential of MBRT as a completely novel form of radiation therapy that warrants further study.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.