Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687553›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2025

Regenerative strategies for intervertebral disc degeneration.

Raed H Ogaili, Ahmed Alassal, Nurul Fariha Za'aba, Izzat Zulkiflee, Isma Liza Mohd Isa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raed H OgailiDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ahmed AlassalRiverside School of Medicine (UCR-SOM), University of California, Riverside, 900 University Ave, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Nurul Fariha Za'abaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Izzat ZulkifleeCÚRAM Research Ireland Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, H91 W2TY, Ireland.
Isma Liza Mohd IsaCÚRAM Research Ireland Centre for Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, H91 W2TY, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a global health problem, primarily caused by intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. Current treatments focus on symptom relief without addressing the underlying degenerative mechanisms. Regenerative strategies have emerged as promising therapies through the use of functional biomaterials and stem cells capable of modulating key signalling pathways to promote tissue regeneration. However, challenges such as efficient delivery systems, long-term survival of transplanted cells, and hostile disc microenvironment remain. This review focuses on recent advances in regenerative approaches using biomaterials, cells, and therapeutic agents of exosomes, and genes to restore IVD structure and function. We discuss the current understanding of IVD anatomy, physiology and degeneration pathophysiology followed by current treatments. We highlight the rationale for regenerative therapy in halting the degenerative hallmarks tailored to mild, moderate to severe IVD degeneration. Our review emphasizes on the functional biomaterials designed for advanced delivery system, therapeutic intervention and IVD tissue engineering. We discuss the cell-based therapy, highlighting various cell sources, therapeutic effects, clinical trials and its obstacles. We discuss the use of therapeutic agents such as the genes and exosome therapies in IVD regeneration. The clinical translational potential of regenerative therapy is vast and promising, driven by advances in cellular therapies, biomaterials, and cell-free approaches like exosomes, which offer new avenues for regenerating degenerative IVDs. While significant progress has been made in developing safe, effective, and scalable treatments, challenges remain in immune compatibility, manufacturing, and regulatory pathways. Emerging innovations in gene editing, 3D bioprinting, and personalized approaches are poised to accelerate the translation of these therapies into mainstream medicine, with interdisciplinary collaboration and global efforts playing a crucial role in overcoming current bottlenecks and realizing the full potential of regenerative medicine to transform patient care. This article offers a comprehensive framework to guide preclinical research and future clinical translation of effective regenerative therapies, aiming at reducing the global burden of LBP and improving long-term patient outcomes.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsIntervertebral disc degenerationMesenchymal stem cellsregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID40687553
PMCPMC12270810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.