ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2025
Response Monitoring Theta-Band Activities Across Emotional Contexts in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Spectrum Disorders.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SZ) and bipolar spectrum disorder (BD) have traditionally been treated as different conditions but share many characteristics, including cognitive control deficits. Electroencephalogram (EEG) indicators of response monitoring, including error-related negativity (ERN) and theta-band activities (4-8 Hz), have been proposed as transdiagnostic indicators of cognitive control. Research has found that the ERN and theta power are blunted in SZ, but findings have been less consistent in BD. Individuals with SZ and BD also show difficulty in emotional contexts. However, no research has investigated response-monitoring theta activities in SZ and BD concurrently or in emotional contexts. Methods: Data were collected from 32 participants with SZ, 33 participants with BD, and 33 healthy control (HC) participants. EEG was recorded while participants completed 3 modified flanker tasks using arrow, unpleasant, and pleasant stimuli. Effects of group and task on postresponse event-related potentials (ERN, correct-related negativity), theta total power, and theta intertrial phase coherence (ITPC) were investigated using mixed analysis of covariance, controlling for age and accuracy. Results: The SZ group did not show the ERN modulation by task that was found in the HC and BD groups. The SZ group showed attenuated theta power across all tasks, and the BD group showed attenuated power only on error trials with unpleasant stimuli. Both SZ and BD groups showed emotional modulation for theta ITPC. Theta power was correlated across tasks, suggesting that it is task invariant, while ITPC was not, suggesting that it is task-specific. Conclusions: SZ and BD show different effects of emotional stimuli on cognitive control. To elucidate similarities and differences, concurrent data collection from individuals with SZ and BD across contexts is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.