Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687781›Full record

ReviewiScience2025

Updating conservation metagenomics on the gut microbiome of threatened mammals.

Le Wang, Guangping Huang, Guoliang Li, Shibin Yuan, Fuwen Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Le WangJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Guangping HuangJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Guoliang LiJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Shibin YuanKey Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong 637002, China.
Fuwen WeiJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past two decades, much work has characterized the composition and function of the gut microbiome on diverse wildlife in the framework of conservation metagenomics. While promising for conservation, translating theory into practice remains challenging and requires progress. Here, we summarize the progress of gut microbiomes of threatened mammals from ecology and evolution to conservation practice, and propose an integrative framework for future conservation metagenomics within which multi-dimension, multi-scale, multi-technology, and multi-omics can be comprehensively considered to advance our understanding of the patterns and underpinnings of wildlife gut microbiomes. We also propose microbiome banking to archive endangered species' biological information and microbial entities. Moreover, a reference framework for cutting-edge gut metagenomics research on the giant panda is outlined, demonstrating the field's potential. Finally, while microbiome manipulation shows promise, it remains experimental-demanding stringent safety protocols, vigilant oversight, and thorough risk assessment to ensure responsible application.

Indexed as

EcologyGenomicsNature conservation

Identifiers

PMID40687781
PMCPMC12273514

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.