ReviewiScience2025
Updating conservation metagenomics on the gut microbiome of threatened mammals.
Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics reveals functional recovery of the gut microbiome in rescued Sunda pangolins (iScience · 2026Article
- Fecal Microbiomes in Ex Situ-Managed Mammals: Captivity-Associated Shifts and Links to Welfare, Stress, and Reproductive Performance.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the past two decades, much work has characterized the composition and function of the gut microbiome on diverse wildlife in the framework of conservation metagenomics. While promising for conservation, translating theory into practice remains challenging and requires progress. Here, we summarize the progress of gut microbiomes of threatened mammals from ecology and evolution to conservation practice, and propose an integrative framework for future conservation metagenomics within which multi-dimension, multi-scale, multi-technology, and multi-omics can be comprehensively considered to advance our understanding of the patterns and underpinnings of wildlife gut microbiomes. We also propose microbiome banking to archive endangered species' biological information and microbial entities. Moreover, a reference framework for cutting-edge gut metagenomics research on the giant panda is outlined, demonstrating the field's potential. Finally, while microbiome manipulation shows promise, it remains experimental-demanding stringent safety protocols, vigilant oversight, and thorough risk assessment to ensure responsible application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.