Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688060›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025

Trialing addiction neurocircuitry targets and directionality of brain stimulation effects: A deep TMS/fMRI trial in people with alcohol use disorder.

Daniel J Fehring, Jordan Morrison-Ham, Annalee L Cobden, Justin Mahlberg, Mengxia Gao, Claire E Kelly, Arshiya Sangchooli, Devon Stoliker, Emily Giddens, Brody Quinn and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daniel J FehringSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jordan Morrison-HamSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Annalee L CobdenSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Justin MahlbergSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mengxia GaoSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Claire E KellySchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Arshiya SangchooliSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Devon StolikerSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Emily GiddensSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Brody QuinnSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Antonia CholewickSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Luiza Bonfim PachecoSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Adeel RaziSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Natalia Albein-UriosDiscipline of Psychology, Federation University, Berwick, VIC 3806, Australia.
Antonio Verdejo-GarciaSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Excessive alcohol consumption is a global health concern, with an estimated 400 million people living with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Current treatments for AUD have limited efficacy and fail to address its diverse neurobiological underpinnings. There are at least two cortico-striatal circuits relevant to AUD neurobiology: a weakened dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) pathway, and a heightened ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) pathway. Purpose: This trial aims to examine whether deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) can recalibrate the neurocircuitry disrupted in AUD as a proof-of-concept for its therapeutic potential. We will assess the capacity of two theta-burst stimulation protocols to modify neuroimaging and behavioral indices of AUD-related neurocircuitry alterations. Methods: We will conduct a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial with 30 adults with moderate to severe AUD (aged 18-49). Participants will receive two doses of active or sham dTMS (for 2 sessions; 7 days apart; order counterbalanced) targeting the dlPFC or vmPFC with intermittent or continuous theta-burst stimulation, respectively. Results: Primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes (i.e., stimulation-induced changes in neural circuit connectivity, executive control/decision-making, and craving-related emotions, respectively) will be collected before and after each dTMS dose. Additional exploratory outcomes (daily craving experiences and weekly alcohol consumption) will be collected across a 90-day period from the first session. Discussion: This trial innovates by utilizing distinct dTMS approaches to specifically target two functionally segregated neurocircuitries disrupted in AUD. Results will inform the development of a larger-scale trial by establishing optimal therapeutic approaches for AUD.

Indexed as

Alcohol use disorder (AUD)Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS)Functional magnetic Resonance imaging (fMRI)Spectral dynamic causal modeling (spDCM)Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID40688060
PMCPMC12273219

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.