ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Pediatric lower extremity fracture treatments: a statistical review of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pediatric lower extremity fractures present with significant clinical challenges and largely rely on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for intervention evaluation. The statistical robustness of these trials is seldom evaluated, but when examined reveals issues such as small sample sizes and underpowered results. Therefore, this study aimed to test the statistical robustness of RCTs evaluating pediatric lower extremity fracture interventions using fragility statistics. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched for recent RCTs (2000-2023) assessing outcomes for pediatric patients with lower extremity fractures. The fragility index (FI), or number of event reversals required to alter statistical significance, was calculated for all dichotomous outcomes. The fragility quotient (FQ) was then determined by dividing the FI by the study sample size. Results: After screening, 14 studies were included for analysis. Across 83 total dichotomous outcomes, the median FI was 5 (IQR 3-6) with an associated median FQ of 0.070 (IQR 0.033-0.107), suggesting that just event reversal in 5 patients, or 7.0 % of the study population, would alter significance for 50 % of outcomes. 15 outcomes were statistically significant (FQ = 0.029), and 68 outcomes were non-significant (FQ = 0.083). Outcomes were grouped into three categories, including fracture reduction or union (28 outcomes), functional improvement and patient satisfaction (26 outcomes), and adverse events (29 outcomes). Category FQs were 0.061, 0.069, and 0.076, respectively. 47 outcomes were extracted from studies published prior to 2018 (FQ = 0.086), while the 36 outcomes published in 2018 or later resulted in a median FQ of 0.048. Three fracture types were assessed, including tibia (37 outcomes), femur (39 outcomes), and ankle (7 outcomes) fractures, with FQs of 0.075, 0.060, and 0.050, respectively. Across the 59 outcomes from studies with operative interventions, the FQ was 0.075, whereas the 24 outcomes from studies with non-operative interventions reported a FQ of 0.060. Conclusion: The efficacy of treatments in pediatric lower extremity fractures from RCTs are slightly fragile, particularly among significant outcomes. Over time, these studies have become less robust. Larger RCTs that combine the reporting of p-values with FI and FQ metrics may provide more robust evidence for guiding effective treatment strategies in pediatric lower extremity fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.