Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688490›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Time-in-Range Analysis of Responses after Intravitreal Dexamethasone Therapy in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema.

Igor Kozak, Diana V Do, Hongxin Lai, Miller J Ogidigben, Francisco J López

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00168337 phase3completednot on this map

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2005 to 2012Enrolled554ConditionsDiabetic Macular EdemaArmsDexamethasone, Sham
NCT00168389 phase3completednot on this map

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2005 to 2012Enrolled494ConditionsDiabetic Macular EdemaArmsDexamethasone, Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Igor KozakDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science at The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Diana V DoDepartment of Opthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Hongxin LaiAbbVie, Madison, NJ.
Miller J OgidigbenAbbVie, Irvine, CA.
Francisco J LópezAbbVie, Irvine, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Time in range (TIR) is a novel end point that assesses the time during which an outcome remains within a predetermined range. Because the range includes normal parameters, it is indicative of clinically meaningful benefit. The MEAD trial comprised two 3-year randomized, multicenter, sham-controlled, phase III clinical studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I) in patients with diabetic macular edema. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant significantly improved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) compared with sham treatment. We present a post hoc analysis of the MEAD trial to investigate TIR benefit across various thresholds of BCVA and CRT with DEX-I versus sham. Design: Post hoc analysis of results from the randomized, multicenter, sham-controlled, phase III MEAD trial (NCT00168337 and NCT00168389). Participants: Adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and fovea-involved macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy. Intervention: Intravitreal injection of DEX-I 0.7 mg or sham procedure. Main Outcome Measures: Time in range during year 1 was evaluated using BCVA thresholds of ≥69, ≥51, ≥59, and ≥64 letters, and CRT thresholds of <300, <353, <446, and <551 μm (the latter cutoffs being quartile [Q] 1, Q2, and Q3 of pooled baseline BCVA and CRT, respectively). Results: Dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg was associated with a statistically significant longer TIR versus sham at the BCVA ≥69-letter threshold (15.0 vs. 9.1 weeks, respectively; Conclusions: Patients receiving intravitreal DEX-I 0.7 mg had a longer time with BCVA above the driving threshold and below the normal limit of CRT during year 1 of the MEAD trial versus those who received sham. These results suggest that patients treated with dexamethasone experience a longer time with clinically meaningful outcomes than with sham, such as being able to drive or regaining normal structural retinal features. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I)Diabetic macular edema (DME)Time in range

Identifiers

PMID40688490
PMCPMC12271896

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.