Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40688708›Full record

ReviewJAMIA open2025

Current challenges and opportunities in active and passive data collection for mobile health sensing: a scoping review.

Christopher Slade, Yinan Sun, Wei Cheng Chao, Chih-Chun Chen, Roberto M Benzo, Peter Washington

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Digital Technologies for Symptom Monitoring in Parkinson Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher SladeDepartment of Information and Computer Science, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5162-668X
Yinan SunDepartment of Information and Computer Science, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9474-1069
Wei Cheng ChaoComputer Science Department, Brigham Young University-Hawaii, Laie, HI 96762, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3376-7545
Chih-Chun ChenComputer Science Department, Brigham Young University-Hawaii, Laie, HI 96762, United States.
Roberto M BenzoDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-6472
Peter WashingtonDivision of Clinical Informatics and Digital Transformation, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-4411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Mobile and ubiquitous devices enable health data collection "in a free-living environment" to support applications such as remote patient monitoring and adaptive digital interventions using machine learning (ML). Despite their potential, significant data collection challenges persist, including issues related to user compliance with reporting data, passive data consistency, and authorization. This scoping review identifies and analyzes these challenges, focusing on barriers to effective data collection. Materials and Methods: We searched IEEE, ACM, and Web of Science for papers involving training ML models using both active and passive mobile sensing. We used the following search terms: "mobile OR ubiquitous", "EMA", "health", "passive", and "deep learning OR machine learning". We only included papers that collected both passive and active data and excluded papers that used a pre-existing dataset. Results: A total of 77 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies utilized smartphones, smartwatches, wearable devices, and environmental sensors for data collection. Several studies reported challenges with participant compliance in active data collection, while passive data collection faced data consistency and authorization issues. Efforts to address these challenges were documented in some but not all studies. Using this information, we outline current challenges and corresponding opportunities for data collection in mobile sensing studies. Discussion: ML techniques can reduce participant burden in active data collection by optimizing prompt timing, auto-filling responses, and minimizing prompt frequency. Simplified interfaces such as user-friendly smartwatch prompts can further improve compliance. For passive data collection, techniques such as optimization of recording times to preserve battery life and motivational techniques to encourage proper device use can increase data consistency. Conclusion: Mobile sensing offers opportunities for developing intelligent mobile health applications but faces data collection challenges with respect to factors such as compliance, consistency, and authorization. Innovations in ML and user interface design show promise for addressing these barriers.

Indexed as

consumer digital healthmHealthmobile healthmobile sensing

Identifiers

PMID40688708
PMCPMC12274063

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.