ReviewCureus2025
The Intersection of Psychology and Gynecology: A Comprehensive Review of Pain Management Strategies in Women's Health.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nursing-led education and its impact on knowledge, self-care practices, and pain intensity in women with endometriosis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic gynecological pain conditions, including dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, vulvodynia, and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS), present significant challenges in women's health. These conditions result in significant physical discomfort and are closely associated with psychological comorbidities such as anxiety, depression, and increased central pain sensitization. Traditional pharmacological and surgical interventions often provide limited relief, as they fail to address the complex interplay between biological, neurological, and psychological factors underlying pain perception. This review explores the intersection of psychology and gynecology in pain management, emphasizing the biopsychosocial model as a comprehensive framework for understanding and treating gynecological pain. Research highlights the influence of hormonal fluctuations, central sensitization, and neuroinflammatory pathways in pain amplification, further exacerbated by adverse childhood experiences, post-traumatic stress disorder, and maladaptive coping mechanisms. Integrative approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, biofeedback, and virtual reality (VR) therapy, have demonstrated efficacy in alleviating pain intensity and improving emotional resilience. The integration of digital health innovations and personalized medicine presents new opportunities for optimizing pain management strategies. Future research should focus on interdisciplinary collaboration between gynecologists, psychologists, and pain specialists to develop patient-centered treatment modalities. A paradigm shift toward holistic and precision-based interventions is essential to enhance therapeutic outcomes and improve the quality of life for women suffering from chronic gynecological pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.