ArticleBrain & spine2025
Development and internal validation of a risk score for subsidence of expandable spacers in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative disc disease: a retrospective, two-center comparative analysis of stand-alone cage versus cage-plate constructs.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with or without anterior release (TFAR) using expandable interbody spacers - comparative cohort study.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Subsidence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages is a common complication. Little is known about risk factors for cage subsidence (CS) of expandable spacers. Research question: To develop a score for CS risk stratification. Material and methods: We reviewed consecutive patients treated by TLIF with a specific type of expandable interbody implant. CS at the 3-month follow-up was defined as primary endpoint. We identified risk factors, calculated their effect sizes using multivariable logistic regression models and developed the Expandable TLIF Subsidence Index (ETSI). Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC) was performed. Results: We identified n = 388 patients (mean age 64.8 years, 55.9 % female), in which we performed TLIF at 482 levels. CS at 3 months was evident in n = 123 patients and on 153 levels (31.7 %). Independent risk factors for CS were high ASA score (3&4; odds ratio (OR) 2.19, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.37-3.50, p = 0.008), indication for surgery other than degenerative or deformity (4.79, 1.75-13.1, p = 0.002), lower lumbar spine (L3/4-L5/S1; 4.31, 1.46-12.7, p = 0.008), small cage size (1.94, 1.22-3.07, p = 0.005), and more posterior position of the cage in the intervertebral space (1.68, 1.15-2.43, p = 0.007). The ETSI with a range from -2-6 points obtained an AUROC of 0.6807, indicating a moderate classification result. For each 1-step increase in the ETSI, an OR of 2.02 (1.63-2.50, p < 0.001) to develop CS was calculated and it predicted 3- and 12-month non-union risk. Discussion and conclusions: We identified risk factors for CS, some of which have strong effect sizes and are potentially modifiable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.