Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40689137›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2025

Development and internal validation of a risk score for subsidence of expandable spacers in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery.

Martin N Stienen, Lorenzo Bertulli, Linda Bättig, Yesim Yildiz, Gregor Fischer, Laurin Feuerstein, Francis Kissling, Thomas Schöfl, Felix C Stengel, Felix Corr and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative disc disease: a retrospective, two-center comparative analysis of stand-alone cage versus cage-plate constructs.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Martin N StienenInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Lorenzo BertulliInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Linda BättigInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Yesim YildizInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Gregor FischerInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Laurin FeuersteinInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Francis KisslingInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Thomas SchöflInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Felix C StengelInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Felix CorrInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Silvio HeinigInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Nader HejratiInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Daniele GianoliInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Stefan MotovInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Michael BetzInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Benjamin MartensInterdisciplinary Spine Center, H-OCH Health Ostschweiz, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen & Medical School of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Subsidence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages is a common complication. Little is known about risk factors for cage subsidence (CS) of expandable spacers. Research question: To develop a score for CS risk stratification. Material and methods: We reviewed consecutive patients treated by TLIF with a specific type of expandable interbody implant. CS at the 3-month follow-up was defined as primary endpoint. We identified risk factors, calculated their effect sizes using multivariable logistic regression models and developed the Expandable TLIF Subsidence Index (ETSI). Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC) was performed. Results: We identified n = 388 patients (mean age 64.8 years, 55.9 % female), in which we performed TLIF at 482 levels. CS at 3 months was evident in n = 123 patients and on 153 levels (31.7 %). Independent risk factors for CS were high ASA score (3&4; odds ratio (OR) 2.19, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.37-3.50, p = 0.008), indication for surgery other than degenerative or deformity (4.79, 1.75-13.1, p = 0.002), lower lumbar spine (L3/4-L5/S1; 4.31, 1.46-12.7, p = 0.008), small cage size (1.94, 1.22-3.07, p = 0.005), and more posterior position of the cage in the intervertebral space (1.68, 1.15-2.43, p = 0.007). The ETSI with a range from -2-6 points obtained an AUROC of 0.6807, indicating a moderate classification result. For each 1-step increase in the ETSI, an OR of 2.02 (1.63-2.50, p < 0.001) to develop CS was calculated and it predicted 3- and 12-month non-union risk. Discussion and conclusions: We identified risk factors for CS, some of which have strong effect sizes and are potentially modifiable.

Indexed as

Cage subsidenceExpandable spacerPrediction modelRisk factorsTLIFTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID40689137
PMCPMC12272598

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.