ArticleVeterinary world2025
Present trends, research gaps, and emerging priorities in falcon studies: A four-decade bibliometric analysis from the Arabian Gulf.
Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Despite the profound cultural and ecological significance of falcons in the Arabian Gulf, systematic evaluations of regional falcon research are lacking. A bibliometric approach can elucidate the evolution, influence, and emerging priorities within this specialized field. This study aimed to provide the first comprehensive bibliometric mapping of falcon research in the Arabian Gulf countries over the past four decades (1984-2024), revealing research dynamics, international collaboration networks, thematic trajectories, and critical knowledge gaps. Materials and Methods: Original research articles were systematically retrieved from the Scopus database using targeted search strategies restricted to title-level keywords and affiliation filters. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 126 articles were selected for analysis. Bibliometric methods - including co-authorship networks, keyword co-occurrence, thematic mapping, and trend analysis - were applied using VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and Excel. Results: The research output exhibited a modest annual growth rate of 2.32%, predominantly driven by contributions from the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Strong international collaborations (56.35% co-authored publications) were identified, particularly with European and North American institutions. Research themes historically centered on clinical veterinary topics and avian biology are now shifting toward molecular diagnostics, genetic studies, and disease surveillance. However, a clear regional imbalance and underrepresentation of emerging fields such as genomics, epidemiology, and conservation breeding were observed. Conclusion: This analysis underscores the need for an integrative, regionally inclusive research strategy incorporating advanced molecular technologies and conservation science. Strengthening cross-border collaboration, adopting genome-based monitoring, and addressing emerging infectious threats will be critical to advancing falcon research and preservation in the Arabian Gulf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.