Evidence mapPaperPMID 40689243Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Examining Pricing and Availability for Neglected Tropical Disease Therapies in the United States.

Maple Goh, Kevin Outterson, Aaron S Kesselheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maple GohProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0491-5385
Kevin OuttersonCARB-X, School of Law, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aaron S KesselheimProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8867-2666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neglected tropical diseases primarily affect vulnerable populations in low-resource settings worldwide. In the United States, neglected tropical diseases such as Chagas, soil-transmitted helminthiases, and other infections historically affected immigrants but are increasingly relevant for US residents with climate change. We examined the pricing, prescribing rates, and supply of therapies used to treat neglected tropical diseases in the United States and their implications for accessibility and patient care. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prescription rates, wholesale acquisition costs, and shortages was conducted for 11 treatment products from 2019 to 2024, aggregating data from Symphony Metys, First Databank, NAVLIN, Red Book, and the University of Utah Drug Information Service. Results: While prices for most neglected tropical diseases were stable, albendazole prices decreased by 78% while mebendazole prices rose by 60%. Miltefosine remained expensive at $48 000 per treatment course. There are limited manufacturers of neglected tropical disease treatments in the United States, increasing vulnerability to shortages. Conclusions: Addressing pricing irregularities and supply vulnerabilities requires legislative and policy interventions to enhance generic competition, expand public manufacturing, and strengthen supply chains. Such measures are critical to ensuring affordable and accessible treatment options for neglected tropical diseases in the United States.

Indexed as

antiparasitic agentsdrug costsgeneric drugshealth policyneglected tropical diseases

Identifiers

PMID40689243
PMCPMC12275087

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.