ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Examining Pricing and Availability for Neglected Tropical Disease Therapies in the United States.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Priority without progress: the FDA's neglected tropical disease voucher program after 18 years.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Neglected tropical diseases: recent trends and challenges associated with its rapid diagnosis and effective therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neglected tropical diseases primarily affect vulnerable populations in low-resource settings worldwide. In the United States, neglected tropical diseases such as Chagas, soil-transmitted helminthiases, and other infections historically affected immigrants but are increasingly relevant for US residents with climate change. We examined the pricing, prescribing rates, and supply of therapies used to treat neglected tropical diseases in the United States and their implications for accessibility and patient care. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prescription rates, wholesale acquisition costs, and shortages was conducted for 11 treatment products from 2019 to 2024, aggregating data from Symphony Metys, First Databank, NAVLIN, Red Book, and the University of Utah Drug Information Service. Results: While prices for most neglected tropical diseases were stable, albendazole prices decreased by 78% while mebendazole prices rose by 60%. Miltefosine remained expensive at $48 000 per treatment course. There are limited manufacturers of neglected tropical disease treatments in the United States, increasing vulnerability to shortages. Conclusions: Addressing pricing irregularities and supply vulnerabilities requires legislative and policy interventions to enhance generic competition, expand public manufacturing, and strengthen supply chains. Such measures are critical to ensuring affordable and accessible treatment options for neglected tropical diseases in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.