ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental immunology2025
Diagnostic value of CD20 combined with CD138 positive expression in patients with chronic endometritis.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of CD138 and CD20 immunohistochemical staining in chronic endometritis (CE).
methodsA total of 131 patients with reproductive needs, treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University between August 2020 and July 2021, were enrolled. Patients were divided into a CD138-positive group (n=91) and a CD138-negative group (n=40). All participants provided informed consent and underwent hysteroscopic examination using an Olympus 30° scope, following standard operating procedures. Lesion shape and size were recorded in detail. CE diagnosis was based on hysteroscopic findings of patchy bleeding and confirmed by endometrial biopsy of suspicious areas. Biopsy tissues were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for CD138 and CD20. Expression levels were assessed under low-power and high-power magnification (Original magnification: ×400. Scale bar: 20 μm).
resultsCD20 expression differed significantly between the CD138-positive and CD138-negative groups (χ
conclusionsIn patients with chronic endometritis, both the positive expression of CD20 and its high-level expression at ×400 magnification provide valuable diagnostic indicators, demonstrating better diagnostic utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.