Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40689865›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025

Perturbing whole-brain models of brain hierarchy: An application for depression following pharmacological treatment.

Marcel Socoró-Garrigosa, Yonatan Sanz Perl, Morten L Kringelbach, David Erritzoe, David J Nutt, Robin Carhart-Harris, Jakub Vohryzek, Gustavo Deco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcel Socoró-GarrigosaCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-7430-1460
Yonatan Sanz PerlCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Morten L KringelbachCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
David ErritzoeCentre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David J NuttCentre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Robin Carhart-HarrisCentre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jakub VohryzekCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0994-5054
Gustavo DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

CarlsbergfondetCatalan Agency for Management of University and Research Grants Programme 2017SGR1545Danmarks Grundforskningsfond DNRF117EU H2020 FET Proactive project Neurotwin grant agreement no. 101017716,European Research Council Consolidator Grant: CAREGIVING 615539Jane Bradley Pettit FoundationNEMESIS; ref. 101071900Spanish Research Project PSI2016-75688-Pthe European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 720270(HBPSGA1) and 785907(HBPSGA2)Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the scale of neural representations is a central challenge in neuroscience. While localized representations have traditionally dominated, evidence suggests information is also encoded in distributed, hierarchical networks. Recent research indicates that the hierarchy of causal influences shaping functional patterns serves as a signature of distinct brain states, with implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Here, we first explore how whole-brain models, guided by the thermodynamics of mind framework, estimate brain hierarchy and how perturbing such models enables the study of in-silico transitions represented by static functional connectivity. We then apply this to major depressive disorder, where different brain hierarchical reconfigurations emerge following psilocybin and escitalopram treatments. We build resting-state whole-brain models of depressed patients before and after interventions and conduct a dynamic sensitivity analysis to explore brain states' susceptibility-measuring their capacity to change-and their drivability to healthier states. We show that susceptibility is on average reduced by escitalopram and increased by psilocybin, and that both treatments promote healthier transitions. These results align with the post-treatment window of plasticity opened by serotonergic psychedelics and the similar clinical efficacy of both drugs in trials. Overall, this work demonstrates how whole-brain models of brain hierarchy can inform in-silico neurostimulation protocols for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

BrainDepressionMajor Depressive DisorderModels, NeurologicalCitalopramEscitalopramHallucinogensHumansPsilocybinCitalopramEscitalopramHallucinogensPsilocybindepressionhierarchyneurostimulationpsychedelicswhole‐brain modeling

Identifiers

PMID40689865
PMCPMC12412724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.