Trial reportFunction (Oxford, England)2025
Blockade of Angiotensin II Receptor Type 1 Abolishes the Erythropoietin Response to Exercise.
Trial report in Function (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does Calcium Supplementation Negate Erythropoiesis With Endurance Training?Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Beneficial adaptations to exercise depend on the normal function of the endocrine system. Whether commonly prescribed antihypertensive medication inhibits erythropoietin (EPO) production with exercise, a key response to enhance aerobic capacity, remains unknown. Healthy adults (n = 63, 42.3 ± 16.5 yr, 52% ♀) matched by age, sex, and physical activity were randomized in a blinded and crossover manner to orally ingest valsartan (angiotensin II type 1 receptor-blockade, AT1-blockade) or placebo (calcium carbonate, PBO) 4 h before starting the experimental protocol. Before and after 1 h of moderate cycling exercise, blood samples were taken to measure circulating EPO and EPO-regulating hormones along with blood pressure. Cardiac structure/function and peak pulmonary O2 consumption (VO2peak) were assessed during exercise. AT1-blockade decreased heart volumes (left atrium and ventricle) during exercise compared with PBO, particularly in men (P ≤ 0.036). Whole-body O2 extraction and VO2peak were unaffected by AT1-blockade irrespective of sex (P ≥ 0.325). Before and after exercise, AT1-blockade reduced arterial blood pressures (systolic, diastolic) in both sexes (P < 0.001). A condition × time interaction was detected for circulating EPO (P = 0.002), such that AT1-blockade decreased EPO at 3-h post-exercise compared with PBO (P ≤ 0.025). The effect of exercise on EPO-regulating hormones (angiotensin II, aldosterone, copeptin) was diminished with AT1-blockade. Sex per se did not influence the endocrine response to AT1-blockade. In conclusion, in a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study design, AT1-blockade abolishes the acute EPO response to exercise in women and men. Antihypertensive medications hindering AT1 signaling may restrict key endocrine responses to exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.