ArticlePloS one2025
Factors associated with indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Test results during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIndeterminate QuantiFERON (QFT) results challenge clinical decision-making and often necessitate repeat testing. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of indeterminate QFT results and identify associated factors.
methodWe compared patients with indeterminate QFT results to a 1:1 randomly selected sample of patients with determinate results from a tertiary care center in Mexico City between March 2020 and December 2022.
resultsAmong 4,557 QFT®-Plus tests performed during the study period, 10% yielded indeterminate results. A total of 352 cases with indeterminate results and 352 with determinate results were analyzed. In 96% of cases, indeterminate results were attributed to a low mitogen response. No significant differences were observed in age, sex, or comorbidities between groups. Multiple regression analysis identified the following factors as significantly associated with an indeterminate QFT®-Plus result: severe COVID-19 (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.5-6.2, p < 0.001), pharmacological immunosuppression (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p = 0.004), severe lymphopenia (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.7, p = 0.02), anemia (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8, p = 0.001) and hospitalization (non-COVID-19) (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.6-5.9, p < 0.001).
conclusionThe prevalence of indeterminate QFT®-Plus test results was 10%, which is significant, particularly among patients with COVID-19. Indeterminate results were linked to immunosuppression and markers of disease severity. These findings suggest that it may be advisable to postpone QFT®-Plus testing until the clinical condition of patients improves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.