ArticleJMIR infodemiology2025
The Quality and Reliability of Online Videos as an Information Source of Public Health Education for Stroke Prevention in Mainland China: Electronic Media-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality, Reliability, and Viewer Engagement of YouTube Videos on Esophageal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of the quality and reliability of Wilson disease videos on Bilibili, Douyin, and Kuaishou.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of the quality and characteristics of sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome videos on YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A comparative study on the credibility of ischemic stroke treatment information on social media platforms: evidence from Weibo and REDnote.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Factors associated with access channels and satisfaction with health science popularization among health lifestyle instructors.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality evaluation of health science popularization short videos related to cerebrovascular diseases on popular short video platforms in China: cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of Chinese short videos on TikTok related to chronic renal failure: cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Insights into the quality and guideline consistency of dry eye disease treatment videos on Chinese short-video platforms.Digital healthArticle
- Quality and content analysis of syphilis-related short videos on Douyin (TikTok): A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
- Quality and reliability of kidney stone information on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
- Article
- Evaluating the reliability and quality of osteoporosis content on TikTok and BiliBili: A cross-sectional content analysis.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke has become a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, resulting in a significant loss of healthy life years and imposing a considerable economic burden on patients, their families, and caregivers. However, despite the growing role of online videos as an emerging source of health information, the credibility and quality of stroke prevention education videos, especially those in Chinese, remain unclear. Objective: This study aims to assess the basic characteristics, overall quality, and reliability of Chinese-language online videos related to public health education on stroke prevention. Methods: We systematically searched and screened stroke prevention-related video resources from 4 popular Chinese domestic video platforms (Bilibili, Douyin, Haokan, and Xigua). General information, including upload date, duration, views, likes, comments, and shares, was extracted and recorded. Two validated evaluation tools were used: the modified DISCERN questionnaire to assess content reliability and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) to evaluate overall quality. Finally, Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to examine potential associations between general video metrics and their quality and reliability. Results: After searching and screening, a total of 313 eligible videos were included for analysis: 68 from Bilibili, 74 from Douyin, 86 from Haokan, and 85 from Xigua. Among these, 113 (36.1%) were created by health care professionals, followed by news agencies (n=95, 30.4%) and general individual users (n=40, 12.8%). The median scores for the modified DISCERN and GQS were 2 and 3, respectively, suggesting that the included stroke prevention-related videos were relatively unreliable and of moderate quality. Most videos focused on primary stroke prevention and commonly recommended adopting a healthy diet; engaging in physical activity; and managing blood pressure, glucose, and lipid levels. Additionally, videos with longer durations and more comments tended to be more reliable and of higher quality. A positive association was also observed between video quality and reliability. Conclusions: Overall, the quality and reliability of Chinese-language online videos as a source of stroke prevention information remain unsatisfactory and should be approached with caution by viewers. To address this issue, several measures should be implemented, including establishing an online monitoring and correction system, strengthening the video review process through collaboration with health care professionals, and encouraging more selective and cautious sharing of controversial content. These steps are essential to help curb the spread of online misinformation and minimize its ongoing impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.