ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a nomogram model to predict postoperative delirium after resection of esophageal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Subsyndromal Delirium in Elderly Critical Care Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Risk Factors.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of esketamine on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Development and internal validation of an interpretable machine learning prognostic prediction model for postoperative delirium after esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Prediction Models for Postoperative Delirium Among Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Identification and validation of an explainable prediction model of favorable outcome under integrative medicine treatment exposure in DKD adult patients: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Prediction of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nomogram study integrating systemic inflammation indices and clinical factors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Association of preoperative prognostic nutritional index with postoperative delirium after gastric cancer surgery.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aimed to establish and validate a nomogram model to predict postoperative delirium (POD) among esophageal cancer resection patients. Clinical data of 396 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy from November 2020 to June 2023 in the electronic medical records of cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University. Participants were randomly divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Predictors were screened by Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and a nomogram model was built. The discrimination and consistency of the model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), C-statistic, Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). The results were validated using 1000 bootstraps resampling internal validation and testing set. Among 32 potential predictors, the final prediction model included 6 variables: postoperative pain, postoperative infection, dexmedetomidine use, propofol use, duration of mechanical ventilation, and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). The model showed a good discrimination with an AUC of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.885- 0.953) in the training set, and adjusted to 0.911 (95% CI: 0.878- 0.944) and 0.871 (95% CI: 0.802- 0.940) in the internal validation and the testing set, respectively. ROC curves, calibration curves, DCA curves, C-statistic, Brier score and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed excellent model performance. This study successfully established and validated the first POD prediction model for patients with esophageal cancer resection. It could accurately predict the occurrence of POD and effectively identify the high-risk patients, which is of great significance for improving the risk stratification of the population and for implementing targeted prevention intervention measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.