ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025
Minimally invasive surgery: a historical and legal perspective on technological transformation.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five Decades of Innovation-Tailored Breast Cancer Treatment: 1976-2026.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Global Curriculum in Surgical Oncology: 2nd Edition, 2026.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Comparative Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Neural Minimum-Distance Estimation for Collision-Aware Operation of Multi-Arm Laparoscopy Surgical Robots Through Learning-from-Simulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Revolution in Surgery That Saves Millions of Lives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative in vivo assessment of surgical smoke particle exposure from different energy modalities during gynecologic laparoscopy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Unveiling the landscape of robotic surgery: Insights into Indian medical perspectives.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Editorial: Application of minimally invasive techniques in gastrointestinal diseases in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic revision of open appendectomy complicated by high-output colo-cutaneous fistula: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) has experienced a significant evolution over the last 5,000 years, progressing from basic manual methods to sophisticated, robot-assisted approaches. The evolution of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been influenced by significant advancements in endoscopic visualization, electrosurgery, and laparoscopic tools, while recent innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic systems have further augmented surgical accuracy, minimized operative trauma, and enhanced patient outcomes. Notwithstanding its therapeutic advantages, minimally invasive surgery presents considerable medicolegal complications. The escalating intricacy of surgical technologies and procedures has resulted in an increased possibility of malpractice claims, presenting significant financial and professional hazards to healthcare providers. This requires the establishment of effective risk mitigation techniques, encompassing thorough surgical training, credentialing procedures, and compliance with established clinical standards. This review is divided into three sections: (1) the historical development and technological milestones of MIS; (2) the present landscape and future trajectories, emphasizing AI and robotic integration; and (3) the ethical and legal implications associated with MIS advancements, encompassing informed consent, surgeon liability, and patient safety concerns. The document underscores the pressing necessity for the advancement of legal and ethical frameworks to align with technological progress. Balancing innovation with ethical and legal safeguards is essential to ensure both progress and protection in modern surgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.