Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691391›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025

Minimally invasive surgery: a historical and legal perspective on technological transformation.

J Ravichandran Jeganathan, Ravindran Jegasothy, Woon Teen Sia

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Ravichandran JeganathanMonash Medical University, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-1452
Ravindran JegasothyMAHSA University, Jenjarom, Malaysia.
Woon Teen SiaMonash Medical University, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. wsia0002@student.monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5122-1061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) has experienced a significant evolution over the last 5,000 years, progressing from basic manual methods to sophisticated, robot-assisted approaches. The evolution of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been influenced by significant advancements in endoscopic visualization, electrosurgery, and laparoscopic tools, while recent innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic systems have further augmented surgical accuracy, minimized operative trauma, and enhanced patient outcomes. Notwithstanding its therapeutic advantages, minimally invasive surgery presents considerable medicolegal complications. The escalating intricacy of surgical technologies and procedures has resulted in an increased possibility of malpractice claims, presenting significant financial and professional hazards to healthcare providers. This requires the establishment of effective risk mitigation techniques, encompassing thorough surgical training, credentialing procedures, and compliance with established clinical standards. This review is divided into three sections: (1) the historical development and technological milestones of MIS; (2) the present landscape and future trajectories, emphasizing AI and robotic integration; and (3) the ethical and legal implications associated with MIS advancements, encompassing informed consent, surgeon liability, and patient safety concerns. The document underscores the pressing necessity for the advancement of legal and ethical frameworks to align with technological progress. Balancing innovation with ethical and legal safeguards is essential to ensure both progress and protection in modern surgical practice.

Indexed as

Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresArtificial IntelligenceHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInformed ConsentLaparoscopyLiability, LegalMalpracticePatient SafetyArtificial intelligence in surgeryMedicolegal issuesMinimally invasive surgery (MIS)Robotic surgerySurgical innovation and ethics

Identifiers

PMID40691391
PMCPMC12279690

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.