ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Unveiling the root-rhizosphere environment of perennial wheat: a metabolomic perspective.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerennial grain roots grow continuously, enhancing soil carbon sequestration and forming a "holobiont" with the microbiome, essential for nutrient acquisition and stress resilience. Consequently, perennial grains serve as ideal models for investigating long-term dynamics between root systems and the rhizosphere environment. Despite their potential, the rhizosphere environment of perennial grains remains underexplored. This research utilizes an untargeted metabolomic approach to characterize the root-rhizosphere molecular signals in four new perennial grain (NPGs) lines named 235a, 280b, 11,955, and OK72, across four years of growth.
resultsMetabolomic analysis annotated 2,527 metabolites, most of which originated from fungi (30.3%), bacteria (23%), and plants (15.5%). Principal component analysis explained 54.8% of the variation between rhizosphere and root metabolites, with 8.7% variation separating 1st and 4th year root metabolites, while rhizosphere metabolites showed less variation between years. The comparison between the annual durum wheat variety and NPGs revealed 616 differentially abundant metabolites in roots and 15 in the rhizosphere, already at the 1st year of growth. In the 4th year, NPGs metabolomes diverged significantly from Thinopyrum intermedium, which stood in the soil for 11 years, with 184 root and 138 rhizosphere differentially abundant metabolites. Comparison between genotypes diversified NPGs in the 1st year, showing a higher abundance of root metabolites for OK72 compared to the other lines, including key modulators of root architecture like glutathione and serotonin, and compounds from α-linoleic acid metabolism, which are known to induce systemic resistance against pathogens and herbivore defense. Differences among NPGs also emerged in the 4th year, with OK72 separating from the other three, sharing with Thinopyrum intermedium a higher abundance of purine nucleosides and diazanaphthalenes.
conclusionsThe metabolomic analysis revealed that starting from the 1st year, the roots of NPGs produce a set of metabolites distinct from those of the annual durum species, many of which are defense molecules against biotic and abiotic stresses (e.g., syringic acid, glutathione, and α-linoleic acid pathway compounds). The OK72 genotype, which exhibits below-ground traits more aligned with perennialism, differs from the other lines in the abundance of several interesting metabolites, confirming it as an ideal parental candidate for developing new perennial wheat lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.