ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Listening effort and stress in tinnitus: a multidimensional approach.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Identify and Predict High-Distress Psychosocial Phenotypes in Tinnitus Patients: A Latent Profile Analysis.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated the impact of chronic tinnitus on auditory perception, text comprehension, and physiological stress responses, with a focus on sex-related differences. The main objectives were to assess the influence of sex and stress on tinnitus severity, examine neurophysiological indicators of listening effort, and evaluate the effects of background noise on perceived difficulty and listening pleasantness. Materials and methods: Forty-seven participants (24 with tinnitus, 23 controls) performed a listening task involving audiobook excerpts presented at different signal-to-noise ratios. Subjective ratings, comprehension scores, and physiological data were collected, including salivary alpha-amylase, electrodermal activity, heart rate, and EEG-based measures of listening pleasantness. Results: Control participants outperformed tinnitus participants during the initial quiet condition ( Discussion: These findings suggest that tinnitus imposes a measurable cognitive and emotional burden, influenced by both sex and stress responses. They emphasize the need for multimodal, personalized, and gender-sensitive approaches in the assessment and management of tinnitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.