Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692743›Full record

ReviewOxford open immunology2025

Decoding sex differences in human immunity through systems immunology.

Joan Escrivà-Font, Tianze Cao, Camila Rosat Consiglio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oxford open immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune function varies widely across humans. Biological sex is a key factor underlying human immune variability, with men presenting with more severe infections and increased cancer rates, while women exhibit higher vaccine responses and prevalence of autoimmunity. Intrinsic biological sex differences arise from varying contributions of chromosomal sex, and sex hormone sensing and downstream signaling to different cell types. This complex regulation presents a unique opportunity for the exploration of human immune sex differences using systems-level methods of investigation. Here we analyze the current literature and the applications of systems immunology in elucidating the immune sex differences in humans. We examine mechanisms of biological sex modulation of human immunity via sex chromosomes, and particularly emphasize the role of sex hormones. We then focus on how systems immunology has been advancing our understanding of how sex impacts the healthy immune system at steady state, ranging from cell composition, transcriptomics, epigenomics, metabolomics, spatial and cell-cell interactions, to plasma proteomics. We also examine systems-level applications to investigating sex differences upon immune perturbations and give an overview of key future directions for the field. Systems immunology provides a powerful framework to decode biological sex-regulated pathways in immunity, paving the way for more precise, sex-informed therapeutic interventions to address sex differences in immune-related conditions.

Indexed as

biological sexsex differences in human immunitysex hormonessystems immunology

Identifiers

PMID40692743
PMCPMC12279299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.