ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Experiences and Needs of Patients with Esophageal Cancer Receiving Esophagectomy: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quality of life and survival of achieving textbook outcome for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: With the incidence of esophageal cancer increasing year by year, it is very important to understand the disease experience of patients at different stages of the cancer journey. Supportive care is a long-term task for patients with esophageal cancer. This study was designed to explore the disease experiences and needs of esophageal cancer patients receiving esophagectomy at key time points in their cancer journey. Patients and Methods: A qualitative longitudinal study based on the Timing It Right framework. A purposive sampling method was used, and a sample of 17 patients completed 79 interviews. One-to-one and semistructured interviews were conducted in a tertiary cancer hospital in China from March to August 2024, and Colaizzi's method was used to analyze data. Results: Twelve subthemes were identified: the diagnosis phase (deep in fear and excessive worry, desire for comprehensive and professional information), the perioperative phase (multiple pressures and looking forward to humanistic care, not adapted to the ward environment and sleep disorders, urgently require for symptom management program), the discharge preparation phase (home-based rehabilitative information and medication guidance, home self-monitoring and continuous care needs), the adjustment phase (loss of normal "daily life", avoidant social behavior, social support needs), and the adaptation phase (improved health management behavior, integration into society needs and eager for national policy support). Conclusion: The needs of esophageal cancer patients vary during the diagnosis and treatment process. Continuous and dynamic care should be provided for patients according to their needs in different stages of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.